Legal Opinion

Estate of Cornelious

California Supreme Court

Decided January 26, 1984No. L.A. 31631PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KAUS, J.

Appellant Trudy Ann Hall challenges the constitutionality of the rule of Evidence Code section 621, subdivision (a), that “the issue of a *463wife cohabiting with her husband, who is not impotent or sterile, is conclusively presumed to be a child of the marriage.”1 Hall contends that application of the presumption to bar her from proving that Willis Cornelious, deceased, was in fact her natural father, denies her due process.

Willis Cornelious died intestate, leaving neither a spouse nor legitimate children. His surviving sisters nominated Hettie Taylor to administer his estate.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Stanley v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Kusior v. SilverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  3. In Re Lisa R.California Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Chatham v. MillsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Estate of WalkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. In Re Nicholas H.California Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Michelle W. v. Ronald W.California Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Jhordan C. v. MARY K.California Court of Appeal · 1986
  4. William Dal Porto & Sons, Inc. v. Agricultural Labor Relations BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
  5. Cline v. DrewCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1987

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API