Michelle W. v. Ronald W.
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
REYNOSO, J.
No human bond is cemented with greater strength than that of parent and child. We address the claims of two who assert they are the father of a daughter. One was the mother’s husband; he raised, loved and nurtured the child until temporarily prevented from doing so after a divorce. The second claimant contends he is the natural father, has since *358married the mother and now lives with her and the child. By this triangular litigation each claimant seeks to be declared the legal father; the child, too, seeks a determination.
Evidence Code section 621 declares the presumption that…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Stanley v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Craig v. BorenSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Reed v. ReedSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Ex Parte PresseSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
- In Re Nicholas H.California Supreme Court · 2002
- Dawn D. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- West v. Superior Court of Sacramento CountyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- William Dal Porto & Sons, Inc. v. Agricultural Labor Relations BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.