Legal Opinion
Jarvill v. City of Eugene
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided May 14, 1979No. 74-2507, CA 8516; No. 74-2508, CA 8516; No. 75-3369, CA 8516PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtTanzer, J.
Appellants in these three consolidated cases1 challenge a charter provision and certain ordinances of the City of Eugene. The trial court upheld them all. We hold that the trial court lacked jurisdiction over the appellants’ challenges to certain provisions imposing or relating to ad valorem property taxes, and we vacate the portions of the order which relate to those provisions. In all other respects, we affirm.
The Eugene City Charter was amended in 1973 to confer upon the common council of the city the powers
"To establish, and from time to time to change the boundaries of, a downtown…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Carmichael v. Southern Coal & Coke Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Lehnhausen v. Lake Shore Auto Parts Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Allied Stores of Ohio, Inc. v. BowersSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- City of La Grande v. Public Employes Retirement BoardOregon Supreme Court · 1978
- City of La Grande v. Public Employes Retirement BoardOregon Supreme Court · 1978
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Jarvill v. City of EugeneOregon Supreme Court · 1980
- Jarvill v. City of EugeneOregon Supreme Court · 1980
- Lee v. Department of RevenueOregon Tax Court · 2000