Legal Opinion

Jarvill v. City of Eugene

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided May 28, 1980No. CA 8516, SC 26299Published

1Opinion of the Court

613 P.2d 1 (1980)

289 Or. 157

Michael F. JARVILL, Petitioner,

v.

The CITY OF EUGENE et al., Respondents. Kenneth Lichty, Petitioner,

v.

THE CITY OF EUGENE ET AL., Respondents. City of Eugene, a Municipal Corporation of the State of Oregon, Respondent,

v.

GREAT WESTERN SCHISM, Inc., an Oregon Corporation, Petitioner.

CA 8516; SC 26299.

Supreme Court of Oregon, In Banc.[*]

Argued and Submitted October 1, 1979.

Decided May 28, 1980.

Larry R. Roloff, Eugene, argued the cause and filed briefs for petitioners.

Leslie M. Swanson, Jr., Eugene, argued the cause for respondents. With him on the briefs were Orval H.…

Also in this document: Dissent; Concurrence.

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Railway Express Agency, Inc. v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Union Refrigerator Transit Co. v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  3. People ex rel. Detroit & Howell Railroad v. Township BoardMichigan Supreme Court · 1870
  4. City of La Grande v. Public Employes Retirement BoardOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  5. City of La Grande v. Public Employes Retirement BoardOregon Supreme Court · 1978

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API