Legal Opinion
Bridges v. IIT Research Institute
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided August 9, 1995No. 94 C 1003Published
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
NORGLE, District Judge.
Before the court is the motion of Plaintiff Jack E. Bridges (“Bridges”) for an extension of time, and the motion of Defendant IIT Research Institute (“IIT”) for summary judgment. For the following reasons, Bridges’s motion for an extension is denied and IIT’s motion for summary judgment is granted.
I. MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
On June 26, 1995, the court ordered that Bridges file its response to IIT’s motion for summary judgment by July 10,1995. On July 7, 1995, Bridges filed a motion for extension of time in which to respond. Notwithstanding that…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Thomas FLAHERTY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GAS RESEARCH INSTITUTE, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- Jonah Oxman v. Wls-TvCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
- Joseph L. RAND, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CF INDUSTRIES, INCORPORATED, and Robert C. Liuzzi, Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- Marvin Kagan v. Caterpillar Tractor Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.