Wagers v. Hotchkiss
District Court, E.D. Kentucky
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY SOUTHERN DIVISION LONDON GEORGE WAGERS, ) ) Plaintiff, ) No. 6:22-CV-75-REW-HAI ) v. ) ) OPINION & ORDER STEPHEN R. HOTCHKISS and ) THE REYNOLDS COMPANY, ) ) Defendants. *** *** *** *** The Court addresses Defendants’ motion for summary judgment, see DE 58, as well as Daubert motions filed by each side, see DE 47 (Defendants’ Motion); DE 57 (Wagers’s Motion). All three matters are fully briefed and ripe for review. For the following reasons, the Court DENIES DE 57 and DE 58, and GRANTS in part and DENIES in part DE 47. I. BACKGROUND a.…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.