Legal Opinion
Max M. v. Thompson
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided September 4, 1984No. 82 C 6575PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BUA, District Judge.
ORDER
This order concerns the defendants’ motion under Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e) to amend this Court’s order in Max M. v. Thompson, 585 F.Supp. 317 (N.D.Ill.1984) (Max M. II), wherein this Court reinstated the plaintiffs’ claim against all defendants for compensatory educational services under the Education for All Handicapped Children Act (EAHCA). For the reasons stated herein, defendants’ motion is granted in part and denied in part.
I. BACKGROUND
The plaintiffs’ original complaint presented claims which, although grounded on several statutes, were basically derived from the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Milliken v. BradleySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Miener v. State Of MissouriCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
- Anderson v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1981
- Ralph Pompano v. Michael Schiavone & Sons, Inc. And Revised Pension Plan of Michael Schiavone& Sons, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Twiehaus v. AdolfSupreme Court of Missouri · 1986
- Max M. v. Illinois State Board of EducationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1988
- Martin v. School Bd. of Prince George CountyCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1986
- Max M. v. Illinois State Board of EducationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1986
- K.P. v. JuzwicDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1995
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.