Legal Opinion

Max M. v. Illinois State Board of Education

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided March 10, 1986No. 82 C 6575PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

BUA, District Judge.

This order concerns plaintiffs’ motion for reconsideration under Rule 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and both parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. For the reasons stated herein, plaintiffs’ motion for reconsideration is granted, plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment is granted in part and denied in part, and defendants’ motion for summary judgment is granted in part and denied in part.

I. BACKGROUND

The plaintiffs’ initial complaint stated claims which, although based on various federal…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Board of Education of the Hendrick Hudson Central School District v. Rowley Ex Rel. RowleySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Chevron Oil Co. v. HusonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. School Committee of the Town of Burlington v. Department of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Miener v. State Of MissouriCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
  5. Anderson v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1981

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Max M. And His Parents Mr. And Mrs. M. v. New Trier High School District No. 203, Illinois State Board of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
  2. Straube v. Florida Union Free School DistrictDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1992
  3. Vander Malle v. AmbachDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1987
  4. Kroot Ex Rel. Kroot v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1992
  5. Max M. v. Illinois State Board of EducationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1988

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API