Legal Opinion

Ramharter v. Olson

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided November 26, 1910PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Circuit Court, Deuel County, Hon. GkORGk H. Marquis, Judge. Action, for libel by Anthony F. Ramharter against Knute T. Olson and another. Judgment for plaintiff and defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtCorson, J.

This is an- appeal by the defendants from an order overruling their demurrer to the plaintiff’s complaint. The action was instituted by the plaintiff, against the defendants for an alleged libel.

The material parts of the complaint, omitting the title, are as follows: “ (i) That the said defendants, Knute T. Olson and Ole Olson were on or about tire 22d day of October, 1908, copartners doing business at Clear Lake, Deuel county, S. D., under the firm name and style of K. T. Olson & Bro., and were operating and engaged in the operation of a general business, including the buying and selling of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Moore v. . FrancisNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  2. Triggs v. Sun Printing & Publishing Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1904
  3. Commonwealth v. ClapMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1808
  4. Meas v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1898
  5. Barron v. SmithSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1904

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Gnapinsky v. GoldynSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1957
  2. Brodsky v. Journal Publishing Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Smith v. Pure Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1939
  4. Williams v. HobbsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Springer v. SwiftSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1931

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API