Legal Opinion

Gerald H. v. United States

District Court, D. Nebraska

Decided May 15, 1992No. CV 90-0-484PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

STROM, Chief Judge.

This matter is before the Court on the plaintiffs’ objections (Filing No. 18) to the findings and recommendations of the magistrate judge (Filing No. 17), wherein it was recommended that plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment (Filing No. 10) be denied and that defendant’s motion for summary judgment (Filing No. 8) be granted. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), the Court has conducted a de novo review of those portions of the magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations to which objections have been made.

Summary judgment is proper if there is no genuine…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Holloway v. LockhartCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
  2. Pierre Boulez v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
  3. Robbins Tire and Rubber Company, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Michael J. Roberts v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
  2. United States v. AberlDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API