Legal Opinion

Michael J. Roberts v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided March 13, 2001No. 00-1265PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLEVENGER, Circuit Judge.

Michael J. Roberts appeals from the order of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri granting the government’s motion to transfer his case to the Court of Federal Claims pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1631. Roberts v. United States, No. 4:99CV0489 (E.D.Mo. Oct. 29, 1999). Section 1292 of title 28 of the United States Code grants this court jurisdiction to review such an interlocutory order. 28 U.S.C. § 1292(d)(4)(A) (1994). Because we hold that concurrent jurisdiction exists in both the district court and the Court of Federal Claims pursuant to…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Federal Deposit Insurance v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Bowen v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Flora v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  5. Megapulse, Inc. v. LewisCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1982

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Robinette v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2004
  2. Doe v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
  3. Nebraska Public Power District v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
  4. Alan I. Begner, Cory Begner v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
  5. Dutton v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2004

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API