Legal Opinion
Curnutt v. Holk
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 12, 1964No. Civ. 27195PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NOURSE, J. pro tem. *
Plaintiff appeals from a judgment dismissing his action after a general demurrer to his first amended complaint had been sustained without leave to amend. The action is one to cover damages for personal injuries sustained by the plaintiff through the alleged negligence of the defendant.
In substance the facts alleged in plaintiff’s first amended complaint are: On October 8, 1959, the day of the accident in question, plaintiff was a lieutenant colonel and defendant was a captain in the United States Air Force. Both plaintiff and defendant were on active duty at the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Feres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- United States v. Standard Oil Co. Of CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Wennerholm v. Stanford University School of MedicineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Herlihy v. DonohueMontana Supreme Court · 1916
- Neu v. McCarthyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Taylor v. Lockheed Martin Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2000
- Fry v. YoungCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Phillips v. State, Dept. of DefenseSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
- Phillips v. State, Dept. of DefenseSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1985