Legal Opinion

Spitzer v. Barnhill

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided January 20, 1964No. 5-3133Published

1Opinion of the Court

374 S.W.2d 811 (1964)

Mildred SPITZER, Appellant,

v.

Roy C. BARNHILL et al., Appellees.

No. 5-3133.

Supreme Court of Arkansas.

January 20, 1964.

Rehearing Denied February 24, 1964.

Bruce Ivy, Osceola, Frierson, Walker & Snellgrove, Jonesboro, for appellant.

E. L. Holloway, Corning, for appellees.

GEORGE ROSE SMITH, Justice.

In this case the question which has given us the greatest concern is whether a chancery court, after having taken jurisdiction of a suit to restrain a tort defendant from denuding himself of his property, must then, as a matter of giving complete relief, retain jurisdiction and hear…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Dowling v. GarnerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915
  2. Horstmann v. LaFargueSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1919
  3. Eiermann v. BeckSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1952
  4. Cleveland v. BiggersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1924
  5. Spitzer v. BarnhillSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1964

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API