Spitzer v. Barnhill
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the CourtGeorge Bose Smith, J.
In this case the question which has given us the greatest concern is whether a chancery court, after having taken jurisdiction of a suit to restrain a tort defendant from denuding himself of Ms property, must then, as a matter of giving complete relief, retain jurisdiction and hear the common-law tort action on its merits.
On April 29, 1963, a collision occurred near Corning, assertedly as a result of drunken driving on the part of the appellee Boy C. Barnhill. The appellant was seriously injured, her husband was killed, and others in the car were also injured. As a result of the accident…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Dowling v. GarnerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915
- Horstmann v. LaFargueSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1919
- Jones v. JonesMississippi Supreme Court · 1901
3Cited by11 opinions
- Liles v. LilesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986
- First National Bank of DeWitt v. CruthisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
- Kreutzer v. ClarkSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
- Stolz v. FranklinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1975
- Chamberlain v. Newton CountySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.