Legal Opinion

Haynes v. Wisner

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 27, 1924No. 18279PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPemberton, J.

The respondents were the owners of the capital stock of the Stanley Apartments, Incorporated. That company owned the furniture and fix*93tures within, and a lease upon, the Stanley Apartments, located in the city of Seattle. The appellant owned the furniture and fixtures and a lease upon the Donnelly Hotel, in the city of Tacoma. After considerable negotiations looking towards an exchange of properties, on December 1,1921, these parties entered into a written agreement, the essential portion of which reads as follows:

“That the party of the second part (respondents) shall pay all just debts owing…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Post v. . KearneyNew York Court of Appeals · 1849
  2. Mason v. SmithMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1881
  3. Trask v. GrahamSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
  4. Van Rensselaer v. BonesteelNew York Supreme Court · 1855
  5. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co. v. LinnellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lindley v. SaleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  2. Lee v. WalmsleyWashington Supreme Court · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API