Legal Opinion

Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co. v. Linnell

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 9, 1923No. 23,199PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.

August 1, 1917, plaintiff let to C. C. Chambers Elevator Company a tract of land for the purpose of erecting and operating a grain elevator. The rent was nominal. The provisions in the lease, bearing upon the present controversy, are: “The lessee further agrees to pay all taxes, assessments, license fees, or other charges that may be levied or assessed upon said improvements, or against the lessor, by reason of the use of said premises by the lessee. This lease shall not be assigned or in any manner transferred or said premises, or any part thereof, sublet, used or occupied by any other…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Craig v. SummersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
  2. Mason v. SmithMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1881
  3. Trask v. GrahamSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
  4. Holgate v. BroomeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1863
  5. Wills v. SummersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Security System Co. v. S. S. Pierce Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
  2. Haynes v. WisnerWashington Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Lindley v. SaleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API