Legal Opinion

Trask v. Graham

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 24, 1891PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Appeal by defendant from an order of the district court for Hen-nepin county, Smith, J., presiding, refusing a new trial after judgment of í¡> 182.04 ordered for plaintiff.

1Opinion of the Court

Vanderburgh,' J.

The record shows that the parties jointly entered into a lease with the St. Anthony Falls Water-Power Company, of the date of May 5, 1885, whereby they rented from the company, by lease under seal, for the term of five years from July *5721, 1885, the premises in controversy. By the terms thereof the lessees, Trask & Graham, who were partners, agreed to pay as rent for the premises the sum of $300 per annum, in quarterly instal-ments; and also agreed to assume and pay all real-estate taxes levied on the leased premises during the term of the lease, beginning with the taxes for…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Post v. . KearneyNew York Court of Appeals · 1849
  2. Mason v. SmithMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1881
  3. Van Rensselaer v. BonesteelNew York Supreme Court · 1855
  4. Graves v. PorterNew York Supreme Court · 1852

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. In re Sherwoods, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1913
  2. Cohen v. ToddSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
  3. Indiana Natural Gas & Oil Co. v. HintonIndiana Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Pioneer Loan & Land Co. v. CowdenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
  5. Security System Co. v. S. S. Pierce Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API