Legal Opinion
Jackson v. National Action Financial Services, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided April 11, 2005No. 04 C 1805PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
CASTILLO, District Judge.
Plaintiff Phillip Jackson (“Jackson”) alleges that Defendant National Action Financial Services, Inc. (“NAFS”) made “false, deceptive, or misleading statements” in its offers to settle Jackson’s debt in violation of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”), 15 U.S.C. § 1692-1692(o). (R. 9, Am.Compl.H 8.) Specifically, Jackson alleges that NAFS sent him collection letters that were false, deceptive, or misleading as determined by the unsophisticated consumer standard because the settlement offers were not of a limited duration as the…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Sosna v. IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- John D. Szabo, Doing Business as Zatron v. Bridgeport MacHines Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
- Pedro De La Fuente v. Stokely-Van Camp, Inc., Marcelino Vasquez and Albert Solis, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
- Retired Chicago Police Ass'n v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Murray v. New Cingular Wireless Services, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2005
- Wahl v. Midland Credit Management, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2007
- Herkert v. MRC Receivables Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2008
- Quiroz v. Revenue Production Management, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2008
- Barella v. Village of FreeportDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2014
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.