Legal Opinion
Murray v. New Cingular Wireless Services, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided November 17, 2005No. 04 C 7666PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
CASTILLO, District Judge.
Plaintiff Thomas Murray (“Murray”) has sued Defendant New Cingular Wireless Services 1 (“Cingular”) claiming that Cingular, while doing business as AT & T, unlawfully accessed his credit report prior to sending him a promotion for wireless service. He alleges that AT & T’s actions do not constitute a permissible basis to obtain a consumer report and violates the Fair Credit Reporting Act (“FCRA”), 15 U.S.C. § 1681 et seq. (R. 30, Pl.’s Mot. for Class Cert, at 1.) Murray now seeks to certify a class consisting of all persons with Illinois…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Ortiz v. Fibreboard Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
- In Re American Medical Systems, Inc. Pfizer, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
- John D. Szabo, Doing Business as Zatron v. Bridgeport MacHines Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
- Pedro De La Fuente v. Stokely-Van Camp, Inc., Marcelino Vasquez and Albert Solis, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Nancy R. Murray, Plaintiff-Petitioner v. Gmac Mortgage Corporation, Doing Business as ditech.com, Defendant-RespondentCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
- Beaudry v. TeleCheck Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
- Holmes v. GodinezDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2015
- Wahl v. Midland Credit Management, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2007
- Cavin v. Home Loan Center, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2006
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.