Legal Opinion

Devine v. Geiger

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 28, 1959No. 37828PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Quillian, Judge.

The one question for decision is whether the petition as originally drawn or as finally amended, was subject to the defendants’ special demurrer. The special demurrer was directed against the bill of particulars annexed to the petition. The attack was upon the whole of the bill of particulars, one item of which was not subject to the criticism that it was vague, indefinite., and uncertain. Sufficiently specific was item 1 of the bill of particulars. It read: “(1) Rent (month of June ’56 and from October 15, ’56 to November 14, 1956) $400.” In the case of Lime Cola Bottling Co.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Aycock v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
  2. Dyson v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1901
  3. Henry Darling Inc. v. Harvey-Given Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1930
  4. Laslie v. Gragg Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1937
  5. Washington Water & Electric Co. v. Pope Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1932

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Watson v. Sierra Contracting Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  2. Wren Mobile Homes, Inc. v. Midland-Guardian Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
  3. Haskin v. CarsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API