Legal Opinion

Haskin v. Carson

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 21, 1966No. 41959PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Hall, Judge.

1. The trial court did not err in overruling the defendant’s demurrer to an entire paragraph of the plaintiff’s petition and the attached itemization of the account sued on, as some items alleged in the paragraph were not subject to the objections raised by the demurrer. Devine v. Geiger, 100 Ga. App. 245, 247 (110 SE2d 687): accord Washington Water &c. Co. v. Pope Mfg. Co., 176 Ga. 155, 164 (167 SE 286).

2. The trial court did not err in sustaining the plaintiff’s demurrers and allowing time for amendment to an allegation of the defendant’s answer, on the ground that it failed to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Washington Water & Electric Co. v. Pope Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1932
  2. Epstein & Brother Co. v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1915
  3. Wortham v. SinclairSupreme Court of Georgia · 1896
  4. Devine v. GeigerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1959

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ford Motor Credit Co. v. HitchcockCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API