Legal Opinion

Burns v. Goodrich

Texas Supreme Court

Decided June 23, 1965No. A-10427PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEAKLEY, Justice.

Respondents, R. C. Goodrich et al., sued Petitioners, Mary Gein Burns and husband, and their assignees, alleging they were trespassers upon a tract of land of approximately 831/3 acres in which Respondents claimed to own the entire surface estate. Respondents sought injunctive relief which was granted by the trial court upon a finding that Petitioners owned no interest in the land. Except as reformed in a manner not relevant here, the Court of Civil Appeals affirmed. 382 S.W.2d 501. We hold that Petitioners were not trespassers because the doctrine of after-acquired title…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Duhig v. Peavy-Moore Lumber Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Moore v. CrawfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  3. Richardson v. LeviTexas Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Baldwin v. RootTexas Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Clark, Admr. v. GaunttTexas Supreme Court · 1942

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Perryman v. Spart an Tex. Six Capital Partners, Ltd.Texas Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Ely v. Briley, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1998
  3. Rutherford v. RandalTexas Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Metropolitan Transit Authority of Harris County v. Graham, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2003
  5. Burns v. WoodCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1968

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API