Legal Opinion

Rutherford v. Randal

Texas Supreme Court

Decided January 30, 1980No. B-8335PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GREENHILL, Chief Justice.

This case involves the interpretation of a 1938 mineral deed in order to determine the interests conveyed by that deed.

C. M. Randal, and the successors in interest to other original grantees, 1 brought suit in trespass to try title against Mary Rutherford, and the other successors in interest to the original grantor, 2 Clifford Rutherford.

Randal claimed that the mineral deed contained conflicting provisions regarding the interest conveyed. Randal further claimed that the deed should be interpreted as conveying to the grantees a Vkth interest in and to the oil, gas and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Richardson v. HartTexas Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Smith v. AllisonTexas Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Ulbricht v. FriedsamTexas Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Smith v. LiddellTexas Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Harriss v. RitterTexas Supreme Court · 1955

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Sun Oil Co. (Delaware) v. MadeleyTexas Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Cherokee Water Co. v. ForderhauseTexas Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Centerpoint Energy Houston Electric, L.L.P. v. Old TJC Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2005
  4. Perryman v. Spart an Tex. Six Capital Partners, Ltd.Texas Supreme Court · 2018
  5. First City National Bank of Midland v. Concord Oil Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1991

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API