Legal Opinion
Metropolitan Transit Authority of Harris County v. Graham
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)
Decided May 8, 2003No. 14-02-00284-CVPublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
EVA M. GUZMAN, Justice.
Appellant Metropolitan Transit Authority of Harris County (“Metro”) appeals the dismissal of its eminent domain proceeding against appellees Mary Francis Hofheinz Graham, formerly known as Mary F. Hof-heinz, individually and as executor 1 of the Estate of Roy M. Hofheinz, Deceased, James Fred Hofheinz, and Dene Hofheinz Anton, also known as Dene Hofheinz Mann (collectively “the Adjudicated Owners”). Roy M. Hofheinz, Jr. and the Hofheinz Family Trust No. 2 (the latter entity being “the Trust”), named in the condemnation petition but not served with notice of the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Ltd. v. Williamson County Appraisal DistrictTexas Supreme Court · 1996
- Houston North Shore Railway Co. v. TyrrellTexas Supreme Court · 1936
- State v. Bristol Hotel Asset Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2002
- City of Houston v. KunzeTexas Supreme Court · 1953
- Elliott v. JosephTexas Supreme Court · 1961
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Seals v. Upper Trinity Regional Water DistrictCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2004
- State v. PR INVESTMENTS, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2004
- City of McKinney v. Eldorado Park, LTD., Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2006
- Guadalupe-Blanco River Authority v. Canyon Regional Water Authority, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2006
- City of Frisco v. Chang Su O LinDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 2004
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.