Legal Opinion

People v. Federal Builders & Home Modernization Corp.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided January 15, 1971PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

In our opinion, defendant’s operation of its showroom on Sunday comes within the condemnation of section 5 of the General Business Law. This statute prohibits all labor on Sunday, excepting the works of necessity and charity, whether or not such labor may “ disturb Sunday’s rest or repose or religious liberty ” (People v. Kupprat, 6 N Y 2d 88, 90, citing, e. g., People v. East Coast Attic & Basement Co., 4 N Y 2d 954, affg. 10 Misc 2d 378, and other authorities).

The defense of collateral estoppel appears to be without merit. Significantly, defendant’s counsel conceded at the trial that its…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Yates v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. United States v. MoserSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  3. People v. FriedmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1950
  4. People v. De Sisto, New York County Courts1961
  5. Friedman v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1951

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. NotricaNew York District Court · 1971
  2. People v. AbrahamsNew York Court of Appeals · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API