People v. Federal Builders & Home Modernization Corp.
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
1Per curiam
In our opinion, defendant’s operation of its showroom on Sunday comes within the condemnation of section 5 of the General Business Law. This statute prohibits all labor on Sunday, excepting the works of necessity and charity, whether or not such labor may “ disturb Sunday’s rest or repose or religious liberty ” (People v. Kupprat, 6 N Y 2d 88, 90, citing, e. g., People v. East Coast Attic & Basement Co., 4 N Y 2d 954, affg. 10 Misc 2d 378, and other authorities).
The defense of collateral estoppel appears to be without merit. Significantly, defendant’s counsel conceded at the trial that its…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Yates v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- United States v. MoserSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- People v. FriedmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1950
- People v. De Sisto, New York County Courts1961
- Friedman v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- People v. NotricaNew York District Court · 1971
- People v. AbrahamsNew York Court of Appeals · 1976