Burrell v. Essary
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
The plaintiffs Latrice Burrell, Irene Banks, and Loretta Pratcher appeal a summary judgment in favor of the defendant Thomas Wade Essary. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.
On August 31, 2004, the plaintiffs sued Essary and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company to recover damages resulting from personal injuries they sustained in an automobile collision that occurred on May 22, 2002.1 The plaintiffs alleged claims of negligence, wantonness, and trespass against Essary. Answering the complaint, Essary denied liability and pleaded as an affirmative defense that the…
Also in this document: Concurrence; Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Alfa Mut. Ins. Co. v. RoushSupreme Court of Alabama · 1998
- Papastefan v. B & L Const. Co., Inc. of MobileSupreme Court of Alabama · 1978
- Bozeman v. Central Bank of the SouthSupreme Court of Alabama · 1994
- Ex Parte AndersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1996
- Tolbert v. TolbertSupreme Court of Alabama · 2004
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Ex Parte EssarySupreme Court of Alabama · 2007
- Mandella v. PenningtonCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2011
- Frederick v. WallisCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2008
- Burrell v. EssaryCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2006
- City of Horn Lake, Mississippi v. City of Southaven, MississippiMississippi Supreme Court · 2007
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.