Ex Parte Anderson
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
This petition for the writ of certiorari presents the question whether the defendant, who was driving her friend to the doctor, and who had the benefit of Alabama's Guest Statute, was entitled to a summary judgment on the passenger's wantonness claim. The trial court entered a summary judgment in favor of the defendant driver. The Court of Civil Appeals reversed. Hughes v. Anderson, 682 So.2d 463 (Ala.Civ.App. 1995). We have granted certiorari review, and we conclude that the trial court properly entered the summary judgment. Therefore, we reverse the judgment of the Court of Civil Appeals.
We…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- West v. Founders Life Assur. Co. of FloridaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
- Bass v. SOUTHTRUST BANK OF BALDWIN CTY.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1989
- Hanners v. Balfour Guthrie, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1990
- Bussey v. John Deere Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1988
- Central Alabama Elec. Co-Op. v. TapleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- Ex Parte EssarySupreme Court of Alabama · 2007
- Tolbert v. TolbertSupreme Court of Alabama · 2004
- SB v. Saint James SchoolSupreme Court of Alabama · 2006
- Cheshire v. PutmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 2010
- Scott v. VillegasSupreme Court of Alabama · 1998
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.