Legal Opinion

Burrell v. Essary

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided October 6, 2006No. 2050401Published

1Opinion of the Court

992 So.2d 1 (2006)

Latrice BURRELL, Irene Banks, and Loretta Pratcher

v.

Thomas Wade ESSARY.

2050401.

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

October 6, 2006.

Rehearing Denied December 8, 2006.

Alexander F. Braswell of Lloyd & Dinning, LLC, Demopolis, for appellants.

William J. Donald III of Donald, Randall & Donald, Tuscalloosa, for appellee.

BRYAN, Judge.

The plaintiffs Latrice Burrell, Irene Banks, and Loretta Pratcher appeal a summary judgment in favor of the defendant Thomas Wade Essary. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.

On August 31, 2004, the plaintiffs sued Essary and State Farm Mutual…

Also in this document: Concurrence · Crawley; Concurrence · Pittman; Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Alfa Mut. Ins. Co. v. RoushSupreme Court of Alabama · 1998
  2. Papastefan v. B & L Const. Co., Inc. of MobileSupreme Court of Alabama · 1978
  3. Bozeman v. Central Bank of the SouthSupreme Court of Alabama · 1994
  4. Ex Parte AndersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1996
  5. Tolbert v. TolbertSupreme Court of Alabama · 2004

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API