Legal Opinion

State v. Richardsond

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided August 4, 1987No. 12939PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShea, J.

A jury found the defendant guilty of illegal possession of narcotics in violation of General Statutes § 21a-279 (a).1 In this appeal from the judgment rendered in accordance with the verdict, the defendant claims that the trial court erred: (1) in denying the defendant’s motion to disclose the informant’s identity, and in failing to hold at least an in camera hearing on his identity so the defendant could use the information to challenge the probable cause or articulable suspicion *656claimed to justify the stop and search; (2) in not allowing the informant’s identity to be disclosed despite the…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. McCray v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. State v. BurnettSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1964
  4. State v. SmithSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1962
  5. United States v. Edward FixenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. State v. LeeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  2. State v. MullinsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
  3. State v. HernandezSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
  4. State v. KiserConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
  5. People v. CarpenitoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API