United States v. American Express Co.
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, Abstract 40585.
1Opinion of the Court
Montgomery, Presiding Judge,
delivered tbe opinion of tbe court:
Tbe single question in tbis case is wbetber rosaries composed in chief value of beads are classifiable under paragraph 333 of tbe tariff act of 1913. .The paragraph reads as follows:
Beads and spangles of all kinds, including imitation'pearl beads, not threaded or' strung, or strung loosely on. thread for facility in transportation only, thirty-five per centum ad valorem; curtains, and other articles not embroidered nor appliquéd and not specially provided for in this section, composed wholly or in chief value of beads or spangles…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Benziger v. RobertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Benziger Bros. v. United StatesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1909
3Cited by5 opinions
- Walter v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1959
- Vandegrift v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927
- United States v. A. W. Fenton Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
- Arbor Import Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970
- Vandegrift v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927