Legal Opinion

Walter v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided July 9, 1959No. C.D. 2098PublishedCited by 59 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mollison, Judge:

The merchandise the subject of these protests consists of valances made in chief value of bamboo, which were assessed with duty by the collector of customs at the rate of 40 per centum ad valorem under the provision in paragraph 411 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the Presidential proclamation reported in T.D. 53865, supplemented by T.D. 53877, for “curtains * * * wholly or in chief value of bamboo.” It is contended by the plaintiffs that valances are not commonly or commercially known as curtains and should take duty at 25 per centum ad valorem under the catchall…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States v. American Express Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1917

3Cited by59 opinions

  1. A. & P. Import Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1961
  2. A. & P. Import Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1961
  3. A. & P. Import Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1961
  4. Aimcee Wholesale Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1961
  5. Aimcee Wholesale Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1960

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API