Legal Opinion
Murray v. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp.
District Court, S.D. West Virginia
Decided August 23, 1984No. Civ. A. 83-A045PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
HADEN, Chief Judge.
I. Background
The Plaintiff, Harry C. Murray, Jr., brings this action under the Court’s diversity jurisdiction seeking compensatory and punitive damages against his former employer, Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corporation (hereinafter referred to as Kaiser), for Kaiser’s alleged breach of an employment contract between Plaintiff and Kaiser. The action is now pending before the Court on Kaiser’s motion for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
Plaintiff was hired by Kaiser on September 16,1977, as a maintenance…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- San Diego Building Trades Council v. GarmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Harless v. First National Bank in FairmontWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1978
- Cotiga Development Co. v. United Fuel Gas Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1962
- Berkeley County Public Service District v. Vitro Corp. of AmericaWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1968
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Malmstrom v. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1986
- Baker v. Kaiser Aluminum and Chemical Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 1984
- McKinney v. K-Mart Corp.District Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1986
- Searight v. Kaiser Aluminum and Chemical Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1984
- Interstate Properties, Inc. v. K-Mart Corp.District Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2000
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.