Legal Opinion
Searight v. Kaiser Aluminum and Chemical Corp.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided December 19, 1984No. 80 C 4245PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
NORDBERG, District Judge.
This case involves an age discrimination claim brought by Curtis Searight, Jr. against his former employer, Kaiser Aluminum and Chemical Corporation. Sea-right’s motion to amend his complaint to include a breach of contract claim and Kaiser’s motion for summary judgment are currently pending before the Court. For the reasons stated in the following opinion, the Court denies both motions.
Plaintiffs Motion for Leave to File an Amended Complaint
After examining plaintiff’s proposed amendment based upon an alleged breach of contract, the Court…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Charles E. Egger v. Harlan C. PhillipsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
- Massarsky v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
- Wilbur L. KEPHART, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. INSTITUTE OF GAS TECHNOLOGY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980
- Martin v. Federal Life Insurance Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1982
- EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. SANDIA CORPORATION, a Corp., Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Malmstrom v. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1986
- Perman v. ArcVentures, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1990
- John M. Degrazia v. Ermanco, Incorporated, a Michigan CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992