Legal Opinion

City of Tucson v. Woods

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided November 12, 1997No. 1 CA-CV 97-0503PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KLEINSCHMIDT, Judge.

This is an appeal from an order of the Superior Court upholding a statute which allows certain communities in Pima County near the City of Tucson to incorporate as towns without the City’s consent. We reverse because we find that the statute is a special or local law that violates Article 4, Part 2, Section 19 of the Arizona Constitution. 1

Under Arizona Revised Statutes Annotated (A.R.S.) section 9-101 communities of 1,500 or more persons may be incorporated as cities or towns in either of two ways. When two-thirds of the qualified electors residing in the community…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Eastin v. BroomfieldArizona Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Arizona Downs v. Arizona Horsemen's FoundationArizona Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Armory Park Neighborhood Ass'n v. Episcopal Community ServicesArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Republic Investment Fund I v. Town of SurpriseArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Ethington v. WrightArizona Supreme Court · 1948

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Amalgamated Transit Union Local 587 v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Green v. City of TucsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  3. Green v. City of TucsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  4. Green v. City of TucsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  5. Long v. City of GlendaleCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API