Legal Opinion
Green v. City of Tucson
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 20, 2003No. 02-16700PublishedCited by 46 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FISHER, Circuit Judge:
Plaintiffs are residents and qualified voters of a community known as Tortolita, located in Pima County, Arizona. In 1997, an overwhelming majority of Tortolita’s qualified voters petitioned the Pima County Board of Supervisors to incorporate Tortolita as a new municipality. Arizona law, however, prohibits the incorporation of a community unless all existing municipalities of 5,000 or more inhabitants within six miles of the community’s boundaries give their prior consent. See Ariz.Rev. Stat. § 9-101.01. The City of Tucson and the Towns of Maraña and Oro Valley…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- San Antonio Independent School District v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Dunn v. BlumsteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- United States v. Ravneet SinghCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- Board of Water Works Trustees of the City of Des Moines, Iowa v. Sac County Board of Supervisors, as Trustee of Drainage Districts 32, 42, 65, 79, 81, 83, 86, and Calhoun County Board of Supervisors and Sac County Board of Supervisors as Joint Trustees of Drainage Districts 2 and 51 and Buena Vista County Board of Supervisors and Sac County Board of Supervisors as Joint Trustees of Drainage Districts 19Supreme Court of Iowa · 2017
- Lemons v. BradburyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Kendall v. Howard CountyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2012
- Nichols v. HarrisDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2014
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.