Stan-Rich Co. v. Schneider

Bell, Judge.

The defendant’s first contention is that the agreement as to the percentage of profits to be allowed the plaintiff as compensation under the alleged contract is too1 vague to be enforceable.

Admittedly, a provision in a contract which is too uncertain and indefinite to be capable of enforcement cannot be made the basis of a cause of action. Dale’s Shoe Store v. Dale, 104 Ga. App. 371 (121 SE2d 695). In that case a condition precedent in a contract agreeing to pay an employee the reasonable value of her services “when the store got on its feet and got to making a profit” was held…