Legal Opinion

Hayes v. Simpson

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 19, 1950No. 33241PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTownsend, J.

(After stating the foregoing facts.) As to the necessity of sustaining a motion to strike a case from the docket, where a general demurrer has been sustained and the case dismissed unless within a specified time an amendment is offered curing the defect, it is held in Gamble v. Gamble, 193 Ga. 591, 595 (supra): “Under numerous rulings of this court, where the order sustaining the demurrer allowed a definite time, in this case 30 days, within which an amendment meeting the grounds of the demurrer might be filed, and provided that, if no such amendment was filed within the time allowed the suit…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Clark v. GansonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1916
  2. Folsom v. HowellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1894
  3. Smith v. BuggCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1926
  4. Speer v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Georgia · 1920
  5. Howell v. Fulton Bag & Cotton MillsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. General Motors Corporation v. JenkinsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
  2. Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. BrowerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
  3. Adams v. RicksCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1955
  4. Simpson v. HayesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1952
  5. Dollar v. WebbCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API