State v. Johnson
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MINGE, Judge.
Appellant challenges the revocation of his probation on the grounds that hearsay and illegally obtained evidence were improperly admitted, that the record does not support revocation, and that a continuance was improperly granted. Because the district court did not err in admitting certain evidence or abuse its discretion in revoking probation or granting the continuance, we affirm.
FACTS
On July 2, 2001, appellant Lance Howard Johnson was sentenced in Sherburne County to two years of probation for a gross misdemeanor driving while impaired (DWI). The conditions of probation…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Idaho v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Pennsylvania Bd. of Probation and Parole v. ScottSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. AhmedCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006
- State of Minnesota v. Darren Lee WhitelowCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015
- State of Minnesota v. Donald Eldon LamontCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2024
- State of Minnesota v. Thomas Alan BoosCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014