Legal Opinion
State v. Ahmed
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided January 17, 2006No. A04-2240PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TOUSSAINT, Chief Judge.
Appellant Muña Dayib Ahmed challenges her convictions of two counts of criminal vehicular operation (gross misdemeanor), in violation of Minn.Stat. § 609.21, subd. 2b(l) (2004), arguing that her rights under the Confrontation Clause were violated and that various other misconduct and error occurred. Because we conclude that appellant’s Confrontation Clause rights were not violated and that her arguments on all other issues fail, we affirm.
FACTS
On February 29, 2004, A.A. drove to St. Paul and picked up S.W. and drove S.W. to Minneapolis, where A.A. went inside a…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- White v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- State v. TureSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- State v. SalitrosSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State of Minnesota v. Eric Scott KnutsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014