Legal Opinion
Joseph Jackson, II v. State of Arizona (Unknown) Terry, Deputy Acting Warden (Unknown) Avenenti, Deputy Warden
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 18, 1989No. 88-1550PublishedCited by 1,895 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DAVID R. THOMPSON, Circuit Judge:
Joseph Jackson appeals pro se the district court’s judgment dismissing his action for damages against the State of Arizona and two prison officials. We have jurisdic*640tion under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm in part, reverse in part and remand.
BACKGROUND
Jackson’s complaint alleged that prison officials have violated a wide range of his rights. Jackson also filed a petition to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”), which was granted.
As the district court noted, Jackson’s complaint is “largely unintelligible.” The complaint clearly fails to state a claim under Federal…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Coppedge v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Rhodes v. ChapmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1,895 opinions
- Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Webster Salasker Lucas v. Department of Corrections California Men's Colony-WestCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Christopher Pyles v. Magid FahimCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
- Frost v. AgnosCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Samuel Lemaire v. Manfred Maass, Superintendent, Samuel Lemaire v. Manfred Maass, SuperintendentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
1,890 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.