Legal Opinion

Birmingham News Co. v. Muse

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 18, 1994No. 1921325, 1921937PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

638 So.2d 853 (1994)

The BIRMINGHAM NEWS COMPANY

v.

William V. MUSE.

William V. MUSE

v.

The BIRMINGHAM NEWS COMPANY.

1921325, 1921937.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

March 18, 1994.

James C. Barton, Gilbert F. Johnston, Jr. and Hollinger F. Barnard of Johnston, Barton, Proctor, Swedlaw & Naff, Birmingham, for The Birmingham News Co.

Thomas D. Samford III, General Counsel, Auburn University, T.W. Thagard, Jr. and Cynthia A. Holland of Balch & Bingham, Montgomery, and John P. Scott of Balch & Bingham, Birmingham, for William V. Muse.

2Per curiam

The Birmingham News Company filed an action against Dr. William V. Muse,…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

3Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Abrams v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  2. Truax v. CorriganSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  3. State Ex Rel. Newsome v. AlaridNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1977
  4. MacEwan v. HOLMOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Scott v. KilpatrickSupreme Court of Alabama · 1970

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by5 opinions

  1. Water Works v. Consolidated Pub., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2004
  2. Tennessee Valley Printing Co. v. Health Care Authority of Lauderdale CountySupreme Court of Alabama · 2010
  3. Allen v. BarksdaleSupreme Court of Alabama · 2009
  4. Birmingham News Co. v. MuseSupreme Court of Alabama · 1995
  5. Birmingham News Co. v. MuseSupreme Court of Alabama · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API