Legal Opinion · Dissent

Birmingham News Co. v. Muse

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided September 22, 1995No. 1940257Published

1DissentMaddox, Justice

When this matter was before the Court originally, I concurred in the result of the opinion and wrote the following:

“It is somewhat difficult for me to understand why the Birmingham News Company is not entitled to see what Justice Houston believes it is entitled to see. I was almost persuaded to concur with his special writing, but I concur in the result, which is to remand the case to the trial court: (1) because the trial judge acknowledged that he had ‘not read all of the statements and [had] not look[ed] at all the supporting documents,’ and (2) because I believe that Auburn University…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Stone v. Consolidated Pub. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1981
  2. Berst v. ChipmanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1982
  3. Chambers v. Birmingham News CompanySupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  4. Jones v. InnessSupreme Court of Kansas · 1884
  5. University of Kentucky v. Courier-Journal & Louisville Times Co.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API