Legal Opinion
Suresky v. Sweedler
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided February 19, 2013No. AC 33065PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FLYNN, J.
The plaintiff, Arnold Suresky, appeals from the judgment of the trial court, rendered after a court trial, in favor of the defendants, Joseph Sweedler, William Sweedler, Andrew R. Tarshis, Windsong Allegiance Group, LLC (Windsong), Allegiance Apparel Group, LLC (Allegiance) and Joe Boxer Canada, LP (Joe Boxer), in his action seeking, inter alia, money damages, in which he alleged fraudulent inducement, breach of fiduciary duty, unjust enrichment, breach of contract and conversion.1 On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the court erroneously found that he was not entitled to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Gaudio v. Griffin Health Services Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- Eichman v. J & J Building Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Latham & Associates, Inc. v. William Raveis Real Estate, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Silva v. City of HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
- 418 Meadow St. Assoc. v. Clean Air PartnersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2012
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- CitiMortgage, Inc. v. GaudianoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
- Joseph General Contracting, Inc. v. CoutoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
- Brown v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2014
- Edgewood Street Garden Apartments, LLC v. HartfordConnecticut Appellate Court · 2016