Legal Opinion
Joseph General Contracting, Inc. v. Couto
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided July 23, 2013No. AC 34100; AC 34102PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PETERS, J.
These appeals arise out of consolidated actions in which the trial court rendered judgments holding a builder personally hable for breach of a construction contract and tortious conduct. The dispositive issue is whether the homeowners proved that the builder, in his individual capacity, had incurred contractual obligations to them and was personally hable for the damages that they sustained as a result of the builder’s nonperformance. We affirm the judgments of the trial court.
On June 27, 2007, the plaintiff in AC 34100, Joseph General Contracting, Inc. (Joseph General),…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Kilduff v. Adams, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Scribner v. O'Brien, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
- Giulietti v. GiuliettiConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Ventres v. Goodspeed Airport, LLCSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- Sturm v. Harb Development, LLCSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Brown v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2014
- Joseph General Contracting, Inc. v. CoutoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2015
- One Eighty-Five Stagg Associates v. Linwood Avenue III, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2025