Legal Opinion

Birmingham Board of Education v. Holifield

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided February 15, 1991No. 89-984Published

1Opinion of the Court

KENNEDY, Justice.

We issued the writ of certiorari to examine the narrow issue of whether a review panel lost jurisdiction over this case because of its failure to convene within a 60-day statutorily prescribed time period. Because we find the Court of Civil Appeals erred in its holding, we reverse and remand.

Julius Holifield was employed by the Birmingham Board of Education (hereinafter, the “Board”). Holifield was on nonproba-tionary status, when, on September 6,1988, he received notice of his proposed termination by the Board. The notice stated that the termination was based upon…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bolton v. MOBILE CTY. BD. OF SCH. COM'RSSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
  2. Washington v. Bessemer Bd. of Educ.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1989
  3. Birmingham Board of Education v. HolifieldCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API