Legal Opinion
Linden v. Harper and Row Publishers
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided May 21, 1980No. 79 Civ. 6900 (VLB)PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
VINCENT L. BRODERICK, District Judge.
Plaintiff pro se has moved under 28 U.S.C. § 1915 and Rule 24, Fed.R.App.P., for leave to appeal in forma pauperis my dismissal of her complaint on grounds of res judicata. 1 Her motion is denied.
28 U.S.C. § 1915(a) provides: “An appeal may not be taken in forma pauperis if the trial court certifies in writing that it is not taken in good faith.”
Rule 24, Fed.R.App.P., provides, in pertinent part:(a) Leave to Proceed on Appeal in For-ma Pauperis from District Court to Court of Appeals. A party to an action in a district court who desires to proceed on…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Coppedge v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Ellis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Farley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- United States v. Ralph J. ViscontiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1958
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Busch v. County of VolusiaDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 1999
- Fridman v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2002
- BURDA MEDIA INC. v. BlumenbergDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- Burrell v. SwartzDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1983
- United States v. Merritt (In Re Merritt)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Illinois · 1995
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.