Legal Opinion
Addamax Corp. v. Open Software Foundation, Inc.
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided April 29, 1993No. Civ. A. No. 91-11152-TPublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON PLAINTIFF ADDAMAX CORPORATION’S MOTION TO COMPEL SIEMENS NIXDORF INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC. TO PRODUCE DOCUMENTS PURSUANT TO A SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM (# 137)
COLLINGS, United States Magistrate Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Pursuant to Rule 45, F.R.Civ.P., the plaintiff Addamax Corporation (hereinafter “Addamax”) served a subpoena duces tecum upon a non-party witness, Siemens Nixdorf Information Systems, Inc. (hereinafter “Nixdorf-U.S.”). By a letter response, Nixdorf-U.S. objected to the subpoena on a variety of grounds.1 When the parties appeared unable to resolve their disputes…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- United States v. International Union Of Petroleum And Industrial Workers, Afl-CioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Searock, D/B/A Allied Marine v. Greg Stripling, Counter-Claimant-Appellant, Amf Inc., D/B/A Hatteras Yachts and Aetna Insurance Co., Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
- Dart Industries Company, Inc., Movant-Appellee v. Westwood Chemical Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Gerling International Insurance Co. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue. Appeal of Gerling International Insurance CoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
- Norman v. YoungCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1970
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Microsoft Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
- Strom v. American Honda Motor Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996
- McKesson Corp. v. Islamic Republic of IranDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1999
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Credit Bancorp, Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 2000
- Eugster v. City of SpokaneCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.