Legal Opinion

Cochran v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., Inc.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided September 17, 1990No. 5-89-0474PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Howerton

Plaintiff-appellee was injured when she slipped and fell in a parking lot, used in common by all patrons of a shopping mall, and owned by L.E.G., an Illinois corporation. Defendant, the operator of The Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, commonly known as “A & P,” leased space in the mall for its grocery store. Plaintiff had fallen in the parking lot, on a ramp, located at defendant’s door. At trial, the jury rendered its verdict in favor of the plaintiff. We affirm.

Defendant argues that as a lessee, it did not owe plaintiff a duty to maintain in a reasonably safe condition the area where…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. People v. WardIllinois Supreme Court · 1984
  2. People v. MonroeIllinois Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Tzystuck v. Chicago Transit AuthorityIllinois Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Fitzsimons v. National Tea Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1961
  5. Smith v. Central Illinois Public Service Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1988

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Progress Printing Corp. v. Jane Byrne Political CommitteeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992
  2. Pyskaty v. OyamaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994
  3. Kritzen v. Flender Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1992
  4. People v. BlairAppellate Court of Illinois · 2009
  5. Schusse v. Pace Suburban Bus Division of the Regional Transportation AuthorityAppellate Court of Illinois · 2002

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API