Legal Opinion
Kritzen v. Flender Corp.
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided March 13, 1992No. 2-90-1281PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Geiger
The plaintiffs employees, Werner Kritzen, Ma Phetsisouk, and George Saridis, each brought a retaliatory discharge case against the defendant company, Flender Corporation. The cases were consolidated in the trial court. The jury awarded damages to each plaintiff, and the court denied the bulk of the company’s post-trial motion, granting only partial remittitur of Kritzen’s and Phetsisouk’s lost wages awards. The company brought this appeal. The plaintiffs have cross-appealed.
On appeal, the company argues that the court erroneously denied its motions for judgment notwithstanding the verdict and…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Pedrick v. Peoria & Eastern RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1967
- Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. ThurstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Kelsay v. Motorola, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1978
- Ford Motor Co. v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Loitz v. Remington Arms Co., Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1990
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Michael Hiatt v. Rockwell International CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- Levy v. Markal Sales Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1994
- Clarence Jackson, Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Bunge Corporation, Defendant-Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- Kevin C. Carter v. Tennant CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
- William G. Tullis v. Townley Engineering & Manufacturing Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.