Legal Opinion

State v. Ernest Phillips

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided August 10, 2018No. 2018-014PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarroll, J.

¶ 1. Defendant Ernest Phillips filed an interlocutory appeal of the trial court's denial of his motion to accept a plea agreement after lengthy litigation in the criminal division concerning defendant's alleged sexual contact with two minors between 2012 and 2014. He argues that the trial court accepted his proposed plea agreement and therefore could not subsequently reject it. In addition, he argues that the trial court's reasons for rejecting the proposed plea agreement are legally invalid. We granted permission for the interlocutory appeal on the following questions: (1) may a defendant…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Lynce v. MathisSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. Class v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2018
  3. State v. RogersOregon Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Ieppert v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1995
  5. State v. DelisleSupreme Court of Vermont · 1994

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re Jeffrey R. Gay IISupreme Court of Vermont · 2019
  2. In re Michael LewisSupreme Court of Vermont · 2021
  3. State v. Dean A. LovejoySupreme Court of Vermont · 2026
  4. State v. Peter HirzelSupreme Court of Vermont · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API